Sacred or Synthetic? Evaluating LLM Reliability and Abstention for Religious Questions

Despite the increasing usage of Large Language Models (LLMs) in answering in questions in a variety of domains, their reliability and accuracy remain unexamined for a a plethora of domains, including the religious domains. In this paper, we introduce a novel benchmark FiqhQA focused on the LLM generated Islamic rulings explicitly categorized by the four major Sunni schools of thought, in both Arabic and English. Unlike prior work, which either overlooks the distinctions between religious schools of thought or fails to evaluate abstention behavior, we assess LLMs not only on their accuracy but also on their ability to recognize when not to answer. Our zero-shot and abstention experiments reveal significant variation across LLMs, languages, and legal schools of thought. While GPT-4o outperforms all other models in accuracy, Gemini and Fanar demonstrate superior abstention behavior critical for minimizing confident incorrect answers. Notably, all models exhibit a performance drop in Arabic, highlighting the limitations in religious reasoning for languages other than English. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to benchmark the efficacy of LLMs for fine-grained Islamic school of thought specific ruling generation and to evaluate abstention for Islamic jurisprudence queries. Our findings underscore the need for task-specific evaluation and cautious deployment of LLMs in religious applications.

Citation

F. Atif, N. Askarbekuly, K. Darwish, M. Choudhury, "Sacred or Synthetic? Evaluating LLM Reliability and Abstention for Religious Questions," Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 217-226, https://doi.org/10.1609/aies.v8i1.36543.

Source

Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society

Keywords

5004 Religious Studies, 46 Information and Computing Sciences, 50 Philosophy and Religious Studies

Publisher

Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)

DOI

10.1609/aies.v8i1.36543

Additional links

https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AIES/article/view/36543