Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Item

How Deep Is Representational Bias in LLMs? The Cases of Caste and Religion

Seth, Agrima
Choudhury, Monojit
Sitaram, Sunayana
Toyama, Kentaro
Vashistha, Aditya
Bali, Kalika
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
Representational bias in large language models (LLMs) has predominantly been measured through single-response interactions and has focused on Global North-centric identities like race and gender. We expand on that research by conducting a systematic audit of GPT-4 Turbo to reveal how deeply encoded representational biases are and how they extend to less-explored dimensions of identity. We prompt GPT-4 Turbo to generate over 7,200 stories about significant life events (such as weddings) in India, using prompts designed to encourage diversity to varying extents. Comparing the diversity of religious and caste representation in the outputs against the actual population distribution in India as recorded in census data, we quantify the presence and “stickiness” of representational bias in the LLM for religion and caste. We find that GPT-4 responses consistently overrepresent culturally dominant groups far beyond their statistical representation, despite prompts intended to encourage representational diversity. Our findings also suggest that representational bias in LLMs has a winner-takes-all quality that is more biased than the likely distribution bias in their training data, and repeated prompt-based nudges have limited and inconsistent efficacy in dislodging these biases. These results suggest that diversifying training data alone may not be sufficient to correct LLM bias, highlighting the need for more fundamental changes in model development.
Citation
A. Seth, M. Choudhury, S. Sitaram, K. Toyama, A. Vashistha, K. Bali, "How Deep Is Representational Bias in LLMs? The Cases of Caste and Religion," Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 2319-2330, https://doi.org/10.1609/aies.v8i3.36718.
Source
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
Conference
Keywords
4404 Development Studies, 44 Human Society
Subjects
Source
Publisher
Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)
Full-text link